_____                       
|  __ \                      
| |__) |____      _____ _ __ 
|  ___/ _ \ \ /\ / / _ \ '__|
| |  | (_) \ V  V /  __/ |   
|_|   \___/ \_/\_/ \___|_|

The word ’power’ hasn’t come far ago into the media speech (in Hungary). The socialist dictatorship of Janos Kadar didn’t use to say ’power’ but in the democracy it is obvious that one or more governor parties got the power.  

In the conversation of Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault entitled as Intellectuals and power representation of power is described as a diversified system, wich envolves everybody as panders who lives with power. But they are talking about what is power in its meaning, is it able to be defined. However we can think about the leading class that it has power but these terms are not ready, not well described by the opinion of the authors how also not the power. All of these comes out from their conversation held in 1972.

In etimology of Hungarian word of power there is two related words: to effect and ability of effects. So by this logic to effect is power. Not to below but also diversified.

In democracy power belongs to those who competing in elections get the right of representation of majority but get power ower those who didn’t voted for them. The biggest democracies call themselves power and the biggest dictatorships call themselves as popular representation.

It is also power if anything depends ont he individual. A conception of Nietzsche the will to power the will for something is also power. Every solutions are power if it changes the history and the happenings in any limits. Help or conquest are also powers, who deserves which by who.

The word power is lost because it is even not sure in whose hands is it. It is experiencable everywhere, it is changeable but doesn’t contain concrete meaning in the contemporary speech.